domingo, 2 de agosto de 2015

Hydropower revisited

Abstract
Hydropower is available in inland waters and it can be recuperated using dams. Due to malfunction or an act of war, this equipment can collapse and destroy buildings, roads, etc. and kill people and animals, as well. This paper considers the dam-break problem in a horizontal smooth 1D channel. The fluid is water and the inertial effects are neglected versus the viscous ones in the momentum balance. Assuming the shallow water approximation, a non dimensional equation is built from the continuity and the Navier-Stokes equations in the limit of zero-inertia and solved analytically in two limits: short time and long time. These solutions are then combined into a single, universal model. Limitations of the model are examined by comparison to a converged finite difference numerical solution of the flow equation. Hydropower is also available in the ocean and it can be recuperated using Marine Current Turbines (MCT). The main existing MCT concepts are classified and described. At present stage, the ratio of their exploitation being difficult to improve via the concept itself, different tools susceptible to help in this aim are analyzed. 

Keywords: Dam failure, Finite difference method, Flow regimes, Current Marine Turbines, Shallow water approximation, Similar solution.

1. Introduction
Due to gravity and Coriolis forces, earth waters are in large proportion in motion, so men naturally thought to control and use the extractable energy of free surface flows. Nowadays, Hydraulics which represents 90% of the sources of renewable energies used for producing electricity in the world is in progress mostly in the developing countries. In fact, hydropower is the only renewable energy which allows energy storage. Huge quantities of water are retained behind dams, constituent energy reservoirs available for electricity production. Bigger the dam is, greater the bottom pressure and risk of breakdown will be. Today, reliable techniques of dam design and building are available and do not arouse new research.
Meanwhile, due to the system malfunction or acts of war (e.g. Dnieproghes, Ukraine in 1941) among other causes, dams can collapse. The water released downstream can destroy fields, goods, infrastructure and be lethal. Since Ritter’s original work on dam-break flow [1], many studies have been performed focusing on experiments, theory and numerical methods [2]. Dam-break flow has become a classical hydraulic problem with such high level of complexity that a more realistic configuration raises new studies. In laboratory, the basic problem consists of a dam obstructing a 1D horizontal open channel thin and smooth, dry downstream and with a given volume of liquid upstream restrained between a fix plate and the dam. Unfortunately, no global study considering dam-break flow as a whole was available.
In that purpose, by image analysis methods, Nsom et al.[3] and Nsom [4] performed an experimental study with glucose-syrup fluids with adjustable viscosity and density. They identified three flow regimes: At initial time, the dam collapses and the fluid is released downstream (positive wave), while a negative wave propagates upstream. From damcollapse date to time where negative wave reaches the fix plate, an inertial regime governed by a Ritter’s type motion law [1] could be characterized. It was followed by a short time viscous regime and finally by an asymptotic (long time
viscous) solution. In the theoretical framework, the flow is described by the Navier Stokes and continuity equations, with the non slip condition and the shallow water approximation. Nsom et al. [5, 6] solved the resulting system of equations analytically and numerically. The solutions obtained were in good agreement with the experimental results.
To mitigate the climate change and increase its energy independence, European Union adopted an objective of 50% of renewable energy used in 2020. At national scale, the Environment Grenelle law brought that rate to 23%. These objectives aroused a huge research effort on renewable energies. West Brittany which is one the region in France with the largest coast affirmed her ambition to be the national leader in marine energies, with the help of specific instruments of research and development such as “Pôle Mer Bretagne“ and “France Energies Marines“.
The oceans can be the future of hydropower because it is constituted by more than 90% of the earth water reserved and energy can also be extracted by turbines from ocean waves, currents and tides. The existing marine turbines can be classified in two main groups. One group is based on the density difference between the water and the air. As the ratio of the densities of water vs. air is about 800, it allows to use the pressure exerted by a water stream on a surface exposed to the air in order to obtain an exploitable torque. The other group contains the turbines made of blades completely immerged in the water stream. In that case, the rotor motion is generated by the horizontal displacement of large quantity of water. The Betz limit (59%) gives the maximum ratio of the water recuperable kinetic energy by a marine turbine. To increase that ratio, the EU Commission now encourages not to invent new turbine concepts but to develop tools for improving the output of the available turbines.
In the second section of this work, we develop an analytical and a numerical short time and asymptotic viscous solution of the flow generated by a dam breach which takes place after the inertial solution, while in the third section, we present the main groups of existing marine turbines and we describe the main tools which can be developed for improving the marine turbines ratio.

2. Dam-break flow revisited
2.1. Equation of motion Let 0 h denote the height of fluid at negative time in a smooth horizontal rectangular channel, g the gravity, ρ and μ the fluid density and dynamic viscosity, respectively. Using a cartesian coordinates system with the origin at the dam site, x-axis lying on the channel-length and the z-axis in the increasing vertical direction (Fig. 1).
The fluid is assumed to flow mainly in the direction of x-axis with height h at the given control section of the abscissa x, at time t. 

3. Tools for improving the output of marine turbines

3.1. The existing marine turbines
The existing marine turbines are generally designed as a transposition of wind turbines in the water so, they are gifted with a horizontal or a vertical axis. One type of horizontal axis turbine consists in a single or a twinned rotor, each rotor comprising one or three blades [11]-[14]. The rotors are fixed on a tubular tower set in a foundation in the seabed and emerging above the sea surface, where the system maintenance can be performed. Another type of horizontal axis turbine consists in surrounding the blades by a duct capturing a large area of the tidal stream and accelerating the flow through a narrowing channel into the turbine, the whole system being entirely anchored to the seabed [15]-[16]. An alternative concept is a buoyant system requiring no support structure. It consists in two contra-rotating turbines fixed on a crossbeam. The whole system is tethered to the seabed by a series of mooring chains [17]. The vertical axis turbines that operate in marine currents are based on the the Darrieus turbine principles. The Darrieus turbine is a cross flow machine whose rotation axis meets the working flow at right angles. In marine current applications, cross flow turbines allow the use of a vertically oriented rotor which can transmit the torque directly to the water surface without the need of complex transmission systems [18]. Different versions of vertical turbines were developed such as the Gorlov Helical Turbine [19], among others [20-21]. Other systems exist as for example the oscillating profiles [22]-[23] or the floating system of marine energy [24], but they must be considered as demonstrators in the sense of technical performances. Different tools should be developed for improving the marine energy turbines.

3.2. Better knowledge of marine current
The oceanic ecosystem needs to be understood thoroughly to provide efficient tools for the development of marine renewable energy convertors. The ocean being a complex system characterized by a hierarchy of levels interacting among each other in a non-linear manner, such a goal is intrinsically multi-scale. As such, it requires methods to transfer information between scales and account for cross-scale interactions. The complexity of the oceanic system requires the use of numerical modelling to cover the numerous aspects at once. Until the 21st century, numerical models
were able to cover the different factors of variability and the different scales only through a nesting approach ([25], [26]) of several structured grid configurations, and the use of physical parameterizations for small-scale processes ([27]-[29]). Following the increase in computing power and the development of unstructured grid capabilities, a new generation of models has emerged which allows for enhancement of the spatial resolution only where is needed ([30]-[31]). This new flexibility in adapting the resolution to the scale of processes of interest leads to multi-scale numerical simulations, especially relevant for the challenges encountered by the development of marine turbines. Different tools can be derived from such computational investigations for improving the output of marine turbines. Such tool is for example a better use of the current. Indeed, an accurate determination of the main current axis allows adjusting a fixed marine turbine following the strongest current axis. Only a difference of a few degrees between the turbine and the strongest current axis would make the turbine output collapse.

3.3. Array of Marine Current Turbines (MCT)
An array of MCT’s consists of a given number of single turbine placed one behind the other. Different types of turbines have been developed with either horizontal or vertical axis, but it is now commonly accepted that whatever the turbine considered, the maximum energy can be obtained with an array, i.e. a given number of single turbine placed one behind the other, much more closely together than wind turbines, with advantages in terms of installation costs and cable costs [32]. Indeed, some a priori considerations have been postulated recently, but there is a crucial need of real condition studies.
The basic case to address is the interaction between two turbines. Myers & Bahaj [33] used the tidal current data from the Race of Alderney situated in the Channel Islands to run simulations combined with an analytical method that details the layout energy capture potential throughout a large-scale array. Several array configurations, sizes and the impact of spacing on the velocity distribution were considered in the analysis. For this specific set of data, the optimum configuration predicted an annual energy output at an assigned rated array capacity. A generalization of such result is not easy to postulate.

References
[1] Ritter, A.: Die fortpflanzung der wesser wellen. Ver Deutsch Ingenieure Zeitschrift, Vol.36, N°33, pp. 947-954, 1892 (in German)
[2] Gill, M.A.: “Dam-break problem”, Encyclopedia of fluid mechanics, 6, Cheremisinoff eds., Gulf, Houston (Texas), 1429-1473, 1987
[3] Nsom, B.: Horizontal Vicous Dam-Break Flood: Experiments and Theory, J. Hydr. Eng. (ASCE), 128(5), 543-546 2002
[4] Nsom, B., Debiane, K. & Piau, J.M.: Bed slope effect in the dam-break problem. J. Hydr. Res. (IAHR), 38(6), 459-464, 2000
[5] Nsom, B., Ravelo, B. & Ndong, W.: Flow regimes in viscous horizontal dam-break flow of clayous mud, Appl. Rheol. 18(4), 43577-1—43577-8, 2008
[6] Nsom, B.: “Developments in Complex Fluid Flow for Environmental and Process Engineering”, LAP, Saarbrücken, 2010
[7] Schwartz, L.W., 1989: Viscous flows down an inclined plane: Instability and finger formation. Phys. Fluids, 1(3), 443-445
[8] Weast, R.C., Astle, M.J. & Beyer, W.H., Eds., 1987: „Handbook of Chemistry and Physics“. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
[9] Simpson, J.E., 1987: “Gravity currents in the Environment and the Laboratory“. Joh Wiley & Sons, New York.
[10] Sedov, L.I., 1959: “Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics“, Academic Press, New York
[11] Marine Current Turbines Website available at: http://www.marineturbines.com/home.html
[12] e-Tide Vans Energi website available at: http://www.e-tidevannsenergi.com
[13] Bryden, I.G. et al., 2004 : Assessing the potential of a simple tidal channel to deliver useful energy. Applied Ocean Research,
26, 198-204
[14] http://www.teleos.co.uk/Home.htm
[15] The Lunar Energy Website available at: http://www.lunarenergy.co.uk
[16] Polinder, H. et al., 2006: Comparison of direct-drive and geared generator concepts for wind turbines. IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, 21(3), 725-733
[17] Soli Machine Dynamics Ltd. (SMD) website available at: http://www.smdhydrovision.com
[18] Kiho, S. et al., 1996: The power generation from tidal currents by Darrieus turbine. Renewable Energy, 9, 1242-1245
[19] Gorlov, A.M., 2003: The Helical Turbine and its applications for tidal and wave power. Proc. IEEE OCEANS’03, vol.4, San Diego (USA).
[20] Ponte Di Archmede page available at: http://www.pontediarchimede.com
[21] Blue Energy website available at: http://www.bluenergy.com
[22] IHC Merwed website available at: http://www.engb.com
[23] Bio Power Systems, wave and tidal energy web page available at : http://www.biopowersystems.com
[24] Turnock, S.R. et al., 2007: Development of a floating tidal energy system suitable for use in shallow water. Proc. EWTEC’07,
Porto (Portugal)
[25] Zavatarelli, M. and Pinardi, N., 2003: The Atlantic Sea Modelling System: A nested approach, Annales Geophysicae, 21, 345-
364
[26] Barth, A., Alvera-Azcarate, A., Rixen, M. & Beckers, J.-M., 2005: Two-way nested model of mesoscale circulation features in the Ligurian Sea, Progress in Oceanography, 66, 171-189
[27] Griffies, S.M., Böning, C., Bryan, F.O., Chassignet, E.P., Gerdes, R., Hasumi, H., Hirst, A., Treguier, A. & Webb, D., 2000: Developments in ocean climate modeling, Ocean Modeling, 2, 123-192
[28] Griffies, S.M., 2004: „Fundamentals of Ocean Climate Models“, Princeton University Press, 518pp.
[29] Griffies, S.M., Gnanadesikan, A., Dixon, K.W., Dunne, J.P., Gerdes, R., Harrison, M.J., Rosati, A., Russel, J.L., Samuels, B.L., Spelman, M.J., Winton, M. & Zhang, R., 2005: Formulation of an ocean model for global climate simulations, Ocean Science, 1, 45-79
[30] Pietrzak, J., Deleersnijder, E. & Schroeter, J. (Editors), 2005: „The Second International Workshop on Unstructured Mesh Numerical Modelling of Coastal, Shelf and Ocean Flows (Imperial College, London, September 19-21, 2007), Ocean Modelling (special issue), 28, 1-192
[31] Hanert, E., Ham, D., Pietrzak, J., Schroeter, J. & Pain, C.C. (Editors), 2009: „The Sixth International Workshop on Unstructured Mesh Numerical Modelling of Coastal, Shelf and Ocean Flows (Delft, The Netherlands, September 23-25, 2003), Ocean Modelling (special issue),
[32] Fraenkel, P.L. (2002): Power from marine currents. Proc. Instn Mech Engnrs. Vol. 216. Part A: J. Power and Energy
[33] Myers, L.E. & Bahaj, A.S. (2005): Simulated electrical power potential harnessed by marine current turbine arrays in the
Alderney Race. Renewable Energy, 30, 1713-1731

fonte: Materials and processes for energy (A. Méndez-Vilas, Ed.)

sexta-feira, 31 de julho de 2015

Projeto Tucunaré

Turbinas hidráulicas hidrocinéticas para o aproveitamento do potencial remanescente em usinas hidrelétricas.

Características gerais do projeto:
Potência útil a 2,5 m/s
500 kW
Diâmetro do Rotor
10m
Diâmetro da Nacele
2m
Comprimento da Nacele
5500mm
Faixa de rotação
15-30rpm
Disparo
80rpm
Massa total
17 ton
Volume total
12,5 m3


Objetivo Geral:
}Desenvolvimento de tecnologia para o aproveitamento da energia hidrocinética de correntes;

}Instalação de uma unidade demonstrativa para aproveitamento da energia hídrica residual vertida e turbinada pela UHE-Tucuruí;

Local de Instalação:


Detalhamento de subsistemas:

}Rotor:

Três pás metálicas
com viga central “
I
em aço, ranhuras e
revestimento de
chapa metálica, com
deflexão máxima
menor ou igual a
7% do comprimento
da pá;
Estrutura de fixação
superior para
içamento;

Fator de segurança
mínimo de 1,5





quinta-feira, 30 de julho de 2015

Implantação de Turbinas Hidrocinéticas

Correntina na Bahia, Brasil.
Uma turbina de pequenas dimensões, capaz de transformar a água de rios que cortam comunidades ribeirinhas em energia elétrica, está em funcionamento em um povoado isolado do município de Correntina, na Bahia. Essa miniusina tem capacidade para gerar até 1 quilowatt (kW), em tensões alternadas entre 110 e 220 volts, suficiente para abastecer uma casa com alguns eletrodomésticos e uma bomba-d’água. Pode parecer pouco. Mas para as localidades distantes das linhas de transmissão e que não contam com barragens e represas para a geração de eletricidade, esse pouco faz a diferença, porque permite iluminar escolas, postos médicos e pequenos conjuntos residenciais.
A proposta de implementar soluções alternativas para o uso eficiente de energia elétrica em regiões onde esse bem é escasso ou inexistente é o objetivo da empresa Hidrocinética Engenharia, de Brasília (DF), responsável pelo desenvolvimento da turbina. Instalada no campus da Universidade de Brasília (UnB), a empresa integra o Programa de Incubação de Empresas do Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico (CDT-UnB). A Hidrocinética foi criada há seis meses, mas os seus sócios fundadores, os engenheiros Rudi Henri van Els e Clóvis de Oliveira Campos, pesquisam um modelo inovador de geração de energia elétrica desde 1995, com o apoio do Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica da universidade. Rudi e Clóvis eram pesquisadores e professores substitutos na UnB.
A ideia de construir um modelo de turbina movida pela força da correnteza dos rios surgiu no início da década de 1990, quando o médico Edgard van den Beusch, um ex-professor da UnB, pediu ao Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica (DEM) da universidade uma solução para o fornecimento de energia a um posto de saúde localizado num povoado à beira do rio Corrente, no município de Correntina.






Sistemas Hidrocinéticos

Sistemas hidrocinéticos utilizam rodas d'água ou turbinas para a produção de energia elétrica, impulsionadas apenas pela velocidade do rio, ou seja, sem a necessidade de barragem ou queda d'água. Em qualquer dispositivo hidrocinético, a potência varia proporcionalmente ao cubo da velocidade da água. Sendo assim, para que o dispositivo seja viável, é fundamental que haja uma velocidade mínima, abaixo da qual o torque proporcionado pelo fluxo de água mal supera as resistências internas do dispositivo e a potência elétrica gerada é nula ou desprezível frente aos investimentos realizados. As figuras abaixo mostram a Geração 3 de um projeto de P&D ANEEL com a Universidade de Brasília. Existem protótipos instalados e funcionando, a tecnologia está patenteada pronta para entrar no mercado. Um fator perturbador que está impedindo a disseminação desta solução é que ainda não dispomos de um Mapa Hidrocinético Brasileiro. A metodologia para a obtenção deste mapa ainda está em fase de pesquisas na Academia. Uma alternativa é levantar-se o Potencial Hidrocinético à jusante dos empreendimentos hidrelétricos. As águas vertidas pelas UHEs, PCHs, etc. ainda possuem em média 30% da energia dos estudos energéticos para o local. Com os dados da ANEEL para o ano de 2014 temos 138.000 kW de energia hídrica instalada em UHEs e PCHs; 22.000 kW em construção e 19.000kW em concessão: totalizando portanto 179.000 kW. 30% deste total dá um potencial hidrocinético de 53.700 kW. O equivalente a sete usinas de Tucuruí, a maior hidroelétrica genuinamente nacional. A favor ainda da energia hidrocinética temos a acrescentar que a baixa velocidade de suas pás (cerca de 30 rpm) não perturbam a fauna aquática. Não existem obras de engenharia que possam impactar o meio ambiente, são montadas e desmontadas rapidamente, adaptando-se à demanda atendida. Trata-se ainda de uma geração localizada, perto da população atendida (semelhante à uma Termoelétrica sem contudo poluir). Acrescentamos ainda que as turbinas hidrocinéticas são calculadas da mesma forma que as eólicas (usam os mesmos sistemas de equações). No entanto a densidade da água por ser 800 vezes maior que a do ar, propiciam eficiência de uma planta de hidrocinéticas 800 vezes a de uma planta de eólicas com mesmo diâmetro (tamanho).